SDDP CARDIAC III: Influence Tree for eInclusion Research and Development Priorities for WP4: Difference between revisions

From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "{{SDD_Report <!-- The name of the template --> |acronym=SDDP CARDIAC III Report <!-- Append to variable acronym th...")
 
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
|editor=[[Patrick Roe]]<br>[[Bryan Boyle]]<br>[[John Gill]]<br>[[Bob Allen]]<br>[[Helmut Heck]]
|editor=[[Patrick Roe]]<br>[[Bryan Boyle]]<br>[[John Gill]]<br>[[Bob Allen]]<br>[[Helmut Heck]]
|total_duration=
|total_duration=
|stats=Participants=22 <br>  Number of ideas=93  <br>Number of Clusters=17 <br> Ideas received Votes=54  <br> Ideas on MAP R=31  <br>Spreathink  ST=56%   
|stats=Participants=22 <br>  Number of ideas=93  <br>Number of Clusters=19 <br> Ideas received Votes=54  <br> Ideas on MAP R=31  <br>Spreathink  ST=56%   
|dates=29-31 May, 2012
|dates=29-31 May, 2012
|link= http://network-based-applications-sdd-cardiac.wikispaces.com
|link=[http://network-based-applications-sdd-cardiac.wikispaces.com/file/view/Cardiac_Florence_ReportV4.pdf/395509604/Cardiac_Florence_ReportV4.pdf Download Report]
}}
}}




==Executive Summary==
==Executive Summary==
This report has been developed in the context of the Cardiac project (FP7 - Coordinating Action: Grant Agreement 248582).The CARDIAC project aspired to develop a series of roadmaps for future research and development in the area of accessible and assistive information and communication technology systems by inviting relevant stakeholders and experts from across Europe to participate in three Structured Dialogic Design Processes.
This report has been developed in the context of the [[CARDIAC]] project (FP7 - Coordinating Action: Grant Agreement 248582). The CARDIAC project aspires to develop a series of roadmaps for future research and development in the area of accessible and assistive information and communication technology systems by inviting relevant stakeholders and experts from across Europe to participate in three Structured Dialogic Design Processes.




Line 21: Line 21:
'''What research actions should be supported to exploit emerging network infrastructures and services to facilitate eInclusion?'''
'''What research actions should be supported to exploit emerging network infrastructures and services to facilitate eInclusion?'''


In response to the TQ, the 22 participants came up with 93 actions, which were categorized in 17 clusters. Following the voting process, 54 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br>
In response to the TQ, the 22 participants came up with 93 actions. The ideas were then clustered in 17 categories in an interactive manner, thus providing opportunities for further and deeper clarifications of salient distinctions between separate ideas. The ideas were clarified and discussed throughout the SDDSM, thus enabling participants to achieve a better understanding of the views of other members and greatly expand their own and others. Following the voting process, 54 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br>


<br>
<br>
Line 27: Line 27:
<br>
<br>


According to the participants of this workshop, the characteristics appear to be the most influential  were: <br>
According to the participants of this workshop, the characteristic appear to be the most influential  were: <br>
* Characteristic #2, Explore how users interact and cooperate with intelligent systems
* Characteristic #2, Explore how users interact and cooperate with intelligent systems




The workshop was facilitated by [[Pier Luigi Emiliani]] ([[CNR]]), [[Patrick Roe]] ([[EPFL]]),[[Sifis Klironomos]] ([[ICS-FORTH]]), [[Julio Abascal]] ([[EHU]]), [[John Gill]] ([[JGT]]), [[Yiannis Laouris]] ([[Cyprus Neuroscience and Technology Institute |CNTI]]), [[Marios Michaelides]] ([[Cyprus Neuroscience and Technology Institute |CNTI]]) and [[Georgina Shitta]] ([[Cyprus Neuroscience and Technology Institute |CNTI]]). The workshop was attended by 22 participants from all over Europe.
In sum, the participants of the dialogue reported their satisfaction that their voices have been heard and documented and communicated their expectations for follow-up activities to address the diagnosis of their needs.<br> 


The SDDP co-laborarory was facilitated by  [[Yiannis Laouris]] ([[Cyprus Neuroscience and Technology Institute |CNTI]]) and [[Marios Michaelides]]. The workshop was attended by 22 participants from all over Europe. <br>
In sum, the application of the SDDSM  process supported the Consortium to identify potential research actions that could be supported to exploit emerging network infrastructures and services to facilitate eInclusion.


The workshop was facilitated by [[Yiannis Laouris]] and [[Marios Michaelides]].
<gallery perrow="4">
File:CardiacFlo1.jpg
File:CardiacFlo2.jpg
File:CardiacFlo3.jpg
File:CardiacFlo4.jpg
</gallery>


==External Links==
==External Links==

Latest revision as of 01:33, 3 January 2013

SDDP CARDIAC III Report
SDDP CARDIAC III Report
Report Title SDDP CARDIAC III
Project CARDIAC
Triggering Question What research actions should be supported to exploit emerging network infrastructures and services to facilitate eInclusion?
Dates 29-31 May, 2012
Author(s) Yiannis Laouris
Georgina Siitta Achilleos
Editor(s) Patrick Roe
Bryan Boyle
John Gill
Bob Allen
Helmut Heck
Statistics Participants=22
Number of ideas=93
Number of Clusters=19
Ideas received Votes=54
Ideas on MAP R=31
Spreathink ST=56%
Download Download Report



Executive Summary

This report has been developed in the context of the CARDIAC project (FP7 - Coordinating Action: Grant Agreement 248582). The CARDIAC project aspires to develop a series of roadmaps for future research and development in the area of accessible and assistive information and communication technology systems by inviting relevant stakeholders and experts from across Europe to participate in three Structured Dialogic Design Processes.


The Triggering Question (TQ) was
What research actions should be supported to exploit emerging network infrastructures and services to facilitate eInclusion?

In response to the TQ, the 22 participants came up with 93 actions. The ideas were then clustered in 17 categories in an interactive manner, thus providing opportunities for further and deeper clarifications of salient distinctions between separate ideas. The ideas were clarified and discussed throughout the SDDSM, thus enabling participants to achieve a better understanding of the views of other members and greatly expand their own and others. Following the voting process, 54 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below.


MAP for CARDIAC III.
Influence tree on the actions that should be supported to exploit emerging network infrastructures and services to facilitate eInclusion.


According to the participants of this workshop, the characteristic appear to be the most influential were:

  • Characteristic #2, Explore how users interact and cooperate with intelligent systems


The SDDP co-laborarory was facilitated by Yiannis Laouris (CNTI) and Marios Michaelides. The workshop was attended by 22 participants from all over Europe.
In sum, the application of the SDDSM process supported the Consortium to identify potential research actions that could be supported to exploit emerging network infrastructures and services to facilitate eInclusion.

The workshop was facilitated by Yiannis Laouris and Marios Michaelides.

External Links