SDDP Peace Education Initiative 2017- Actions

From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Revision as of 03:08, 25 April 2018 by Eleni Krekou (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search
SDDP Peace Education Initiative
SDDP Peace Education Initiative
Report Title Peace Education Initiative 2017
Project Peace Education Initiative 2017
Triggering Question What are needed reforms designed and integrated into the existing educational systems so as to render education in the respective communities catalytic

and supportive of mutual understanding, cooperation and peaceful coexistence among the people of Cyprus?

Author(s) Yiannis Laouris
Total Duration person hrs
Statistics Participants= 11
Number of ideas=30
Number of Clusters=9
Ideas received Votes=21
Ideas on MAP R=20
Spreathink ST=X
Situational Complexity SCI=X



Executive Summary

The Triggering Question (TQ) was
What are needed reforms designed and integrated into the existing educational systems so as to render education in the respective communities catalytic and supportive of mutual understanding, cooperation and peaceful coexistence among the people of Cyprus?

In response to the TQ, the 11 participants came up with 30 characteristics, which were categorized in 9 clusters. Following the voting process, 21 ideas received one or more votes and 20 were structured to create the influence MAP shown below.


(influence map)

According to the participants of this workshop, appear to be the most influential were:

  • Proposal 06: Encouraging interaction between schools
  • Proposal 16: Creating a network of teachers
  • Proposal 24: Students’ participation in the program
  • Proposal 11: Organising exchange programmes and visits
  • Proposal 20: Implementing group working and organizing common courses for this purpose
  • Proposal 30: Partnerships between schools and the society in general


The workshop was facilitated by Yiannis Laouris,Harry Anastasiou, Katerina Fotiou and Ngam Leslie Timngum. The workshop was attended by 11 participants.In sum, the participants of the dialogue reported their satisfaction that their voices have been heard and documented and communicated their expectations for follow-up activities to address the diagnosis of their needs.

The workshop was funded under the X.

Gallery

Participants

Name Country
x
















External Links