SDDP Reinventing Democracy - Actions (European Initiative): Difference between revisions

From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
|total_duration=737 person hrs
|total_duration=737 person hrs
|stats=Participants=20 <br> Number of ideas=53  <br>Number of Clusters=7 <br> Ideas received Votes=42  <br> Ideas on MAP R=26 <br>Spreathink  ST=20.5%  <br>Situational Complexity  SCI= 12.98
|stats=Participants=20 <br> Number of ideas=53  <br>Number of Clusters=7 <br> Ideas received Votes=42  <br> Ideas on MAP R=26 <br>Spreathink  ST=20.5%  <br>Situational Complexity  SCI= 12.98
|dates= 9 - 13 May 2016
|dates= 8 - 12 February 2016
|link=[http://reinventdemocracy.info/w/index.php?title=Main_Page]
|link=[http://reinventdemocracy.info/w/index.php?title=Main_Page]
}}
}}
Line 38: Line 38:
'''"What concrete action, project or product would you propose to solve a particular shortcoming of current systems of governance?"'''
'''"What concrete action, project or product would you propose to solve a particular shortcoming of current systems of governance?"'''


In response to the TQ, the 16 participants came up with 57 characteristics, which were categorized in 7 clusters. Following the voting process, 38 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br>
In response to the TQ, the 20 participants came up with 57 characteristics, which were categorized in 7 clusters. Following the voting process, 38 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br>


<br>
<br>




[[File:ReinventingDemocracy_SDDKenya_Μap_Action_Plans.jpg|thumbnail|center|400px|alt=Influence Map.|Influence tree from the Characteristics SDDP of the Reinventing Democracy workshop for TQ]]
[[File:RD EU Actions.png|thumbnail|center|400px|alt=Influence Map.|Influence tree from the Characteristics SDDP of the Reinventing Democracy workshop for TQ]]


<br>
<br>

Revision as of 04:03, 12 July 2016






SDDP Reinventing Democracy in the Digital Era (UNDEF) Report
SDDP Reinventing Democracy in the Digital Era (UNDEF) Report
Report Title Reinventing Democracy in the Digital Era (UNDEF) Report
Project Reinventing Democracy in the Digital Era (UNDEF)
Triggering Question ""What concrete action, project or product would you propose to solve a particular shortcoming of current systems of governance?""
Dates 8 - 12 February 2016
Author(s) Yiannis Laouris
Maria Georgiou
Total Duration 737 person hrs
Statistics Participants=20
Number of ideas=53
Number of Clusters=7
Ideas received Votes=42
Ideas on MAP R=26
Spreathink ST=20.5%
Situational Complexity SCI= 12.98
Download [1]



Executive Summary

This paper reports the results of the second of a series of workshops organized by Future Worlds Center under the auspices of UNDEF. The dialogue was implemented in the context of the Reinventing Democracy in the Digital Era (UNDEF) project. The purpose of this project was to bring together young people from all aroud the world in an attempt to take apart and reconstruct the concept of democracy. The workshop was organized using the structured dialogic design process (SDDP) approach within the context of a rich web-based communication environment. This Co-Laboratoty was organized using the Structured Democratic Dialogue Process (SDDP) approach within the context of a rich web-based communication environment. It is organized by European Initiative.





The Triggering Question (TQ) was
"What concrete action, project or product would you propose to solve a particular shortcoming of current systems of governance?"

In response to the TQ, the 20 participants came up with 57 characteristics, which were categorized in 7 clusters. Following the voting process, 38 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below.



Influence Map.
Influence tree from the Characteristics SDDP of the Reinventing Democracy workshop for TQ





According to the participants of this workshop, appear to be the most influential were:

  • Action Plan 26, Engage legal practitioners and experts to come out with an extensive legal framework on the right to information.
  • Action Plan 18, Economic empowerment of the less advantaged.




Gallery

<gallery mode="packed-hover">



Participants