Policy: Working in multiple projects: Difference between revisions

From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Future Worlds Center's Associates are typically engaged in multiple projects, i.e., they belong to multiple “circles” (i.e., projects) at the same time (see Fig. 1). Their individual contributions and responsibilities in each project might differ in intensity, and they are agreed in advance. Projects have different sizes. Each project has one Coordinator (upper semi-circle in each project) and several members (who can also be external as- sociates). Projects may be funded or not. Usually, new Associates negotiate their placement in at least 3 main projects: A primary, a secondary and a minor. In many cases, either the primary or the secondary project is the one that also provides for the “daily living” (i.e., Renumeration). However, in most cases, Associates may receive financial benefits from all funded projects in which they participate.
Future Worlds Center's Associates are typically engaged in multiple projects, i.e., they belong to multiple “circles” (i.e., projects) at the same time (see Fig. 1). Their individual contributions and responsibilities in each project might differ in intensity, and they are agreed in advance. Projects have different sizes. Each project has one Coordinator (upper semi-circle in each project) and several members (who can also be external Associates). Projects may be funded or not. Usually, new Associates negotiate their placement in at least 3 main projects: A primary, a secondary and a minor. In many cases, either the primary or the secondary project is the one that also provides for the “daily living” (i.e., Renumeration). However, in most cases, Associates may receive financial benefits from all funded projects in which they participate.


Optimally, these two projects are funded, which offers flexibility and stability for the individual. However, Future Worlds keeps money issues separate from projects in which its associates are active. In other words, funding options do not dictate our orientation and activities. An easy-to-understand explanation is the following:
Optimally, these two projects are funded, which offers flexibility and stability for the individual. However, Future Worlds Center keeps money issues separate from projects in which its Associates are active. In other words, funding options do not dictate our orientation and activities. An easy-to-understand explanation is the following:
* New Associates are trusted with funds that others have secured before them.  
* New Associates are trusted with funds that others have secured before them.  
* In the realm of practical ethics, they are then expected to pay back the “gift” in three different ways:
* In the realm of practical ethics, they are then expected to pay back the “gift” in three different ways:

Revision as of 00:56, 12 July 2011

Future Worlds Center's Associates are typically engaged in multiple projects, i.e., they belong to multiple “circles” (i.e., projects) at the same time (see Fig. 1). Their individual contributions and responsibilities in each project might differ in intensity, and they are agreed in advance. Projects have different sizes. Each project has one Coordinator (upper semi-circle in each project) and several members (who can also be external Associates). Projects may be funded or not. Usually, new Associates negotiate their placement in at least 3 main projects: A primary, a secondary and a minor. In many cases, either the primary or the secondary project is the one that also provides for the “daily living” (i.e., Renumeration). However, in most cases, Associates may receive financial benefits from all funded projects in which they participate.

Optimally, these two projects are funded, which offers flexibility and stability for the individual. However, Future Worlds Center keeps money issues separate from projects in which its Associates are active. In other words, funding options do not dictate our orientation and activities. An easy-to-understand explanation is the following:

  • New Associates are trusted with funds that others have secured before them.
  • In the realm of practical ethics, they are then expected to pay back the “gift” in three different ways:
  1. Pay back the organization by securing new funds to support continuation of activities;
  2. Create analogous opportunities for others to join later;
  3. Support themselves by creating funding and working options.