SDDP Act Beyond Borders Vision Building in Larnaca in 2010: Difference between revisions

From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "{{SDD_Report <!-- The name of the template --> |acronym=SDDP Vision Building (Larnaca 2010) <!-- Append to varia...")
 
No edit summary
 
(47 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{SDD_Report                                          <!-- The name of the template -->
{{SDD_Report                                          <!-- The name of the template -->
   |acronym=SDDP Vision Building (Larnaca 2010)                     <!-- Append to variable acronym the content  acronym of the sdd report -->
   |acronym=Act Beyond Borders: Vision of “what ought to be”                     <!-- Append to variable acronym the content  acronym of the sdd report -->
|book_image=   <!-- You can replace all the template's variables with the content-->
|book_image=Act_Beyond_Borders.png    <!-- You can replace all the template's variables with the content-->
|report_title=Mechanisms that ensure successful technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services
|report_title=SDDP Act Beyond Borders Vision Building (Larnaka 2010)
|Triggering_Question=What mechanisms would ensure successful technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services?
|Triggering_Question=“What are descriptors of a mutually beneficial co-existence of Israelis and Palestinians?
|project=[[CARDIAC]]
|project=[[Act Beyond Borders]]
|author=[[Yiannis Laouris]] <br> [[Georgina Siitta Achilleos]]
|author=Anna-Maria Drousiotou
|editor= [[Marios Michaeldes]] <br> [[Marios Constantinides]] <br> [[Vados Savvides]] <br> [[Cyprus Academy of Public Administration]]
|editor=[[Yiannis Laouris]], [[Larry Fergeson]], [[Kerstin Wittig]], [[Aleco Christakis]]
|total_duration=2 days
|facilitators=[[Yiannis Laouris]], [[Aleco Christakis]], Antonis Loizou, Maria Kyprianou
|stats=Participants=21 <br> Number of ideas=55 <br>Number of Clusters=18 <br> Ideas received Votes=23 <br> Ideas on MAP R=19  <br>Spreathink  ST=40%
|total_duration=6 days
|dates=16th - 17th February 2010
|stats=Participants=21 <br> Number of ideas=69 <br>Number of Clusters=10 <br> Ideas received Votes=6  
|link=[http://accessible-assistive-sdd-cardiac.wikispaces.com/file/view/Cardiac_Pafos_SDD_A4_20110218.pdf/406905392/Cardiac_Pafos_SDD_A4_20110218.pdf Download Report]
|dates=24th - 31th February 2010
|link=
}}
}}




==Executive Summary==
==SDD Co-Laboratory Overview==
This report has been developed in the context of the [[CARDIAC]] project (FP7 - Coordinating Action: Grant Agreement 248582). The goal of the project is to create a platform that can bring together the various stakeholders in the area of accessible and assistive ICT with a view to identifying Research & Development gaps and emerging trends and generating a research agenda roadmap.


The workshop was facilitated by Dr.[[Yiannis Laouris]] ([[Cyprus Neuroscience and Technology Institute |CNTI]]), Dr. [[Aleco Christakis]] , Dr. Antonis Loizou, Mrs. Maria Kyprianou.


This report was prepared in the context of the project “Human Rights and Reconciliation – Civil Society Acts Beyond Borders’.


<u>The [[Triggering Question]] (TQ) was </u><br>
The project brought together stakeholders from Israel and the Palestinian Territories with the view of facilitating the peaceful conciliation and management of group interests and promoting solutions on divisive matters or controversial areas.
'''What mechanisms would ensure successful technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services?'''


In response to the TQ, the 21 participants came up with 55 mechanisms, which were categorized in 10 clusters. Following the voting process, 37 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br>


The Triggering Question (TQ) was:
<br>
<br>
[[File:Cardiac_I_map.jpg|thumb|center|upright=2.0|alt=MAP for CARDIAC III.|Influence tree on the mechanisms that would ensure successful technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services.]]
 
'''“What are descriptors of a mutually beneficial co-existence of Israelis and Palestinians?”'''
 
<br>
In response to the TQ, the 21 participants of the interactive co-laboratory collected a total of 69 descriptors. In the next step, a smaller group of the participants clustered all ideas. The following ten clusters were formed:<br>
 
<br>
 
Cluster 1: Freedom of Movement
<br>
Cluster 2: Sustainable Future for Israel
<br>
Cluster 3: Civil Society
<br>
Cluster 4: Equality and Self-determination
<br>
Cluster 5: Controversial Issues
<br>
Cluster 6: Allocation of Priorities
<br>
Cluster 7:      Economic Cooperation
<br>
Cluster 9: Coexistence Tools
<br>
Cluster 10:    No More War
<br>
 
<br>
 
Having classified all ideas according to the clusters, all participants voted for their most favourable descriptors. The votes were widely spread among most of the descriptors. The descriptors that received the most votes were:<br>
 
<br>
 
Descriptor# 50 (12 votes):  The Palestinian refugees will return.
<br>
Descriptor# 9 (10 votes):    Moving from one city to other without wasting time at checkpoints.
<br>
Descriptor# 7 (8 votes):      Each people dealing with the problems and desires independently but with cooperation and mutual assistance.
<br>
Descriptor# 68 (7 votes):    A major decrease of both  nationalism and religiosity ideas and perceptions of life among people of both sides.
<br>
Descriptor# 36 (6 votes):    Israel  and  Palestine will be a major player in the world economy.
<br>
Descriptor# 60 (6 votes):    After one year from now we will not see any Palestinian in Israeli prisons.
<br>
 
 
The voting results were used to select ideas for the subsequent structuring process which resulted in the creation of what is called ‘a tree of influences', shown below. <br>
 
<br>
<br>
==Tree of Influence==
[[File:Tree_of_influence3s.jpg|thumb|center|upright=5.0|alt=MAP for  Tree_of_influence3s.|Influence tree  ]]
<br>
The highly complex ‘tree of influence’, also referred to as an ‘influence map’ consists of five different levels of influence. Descriptors at the bottom are considered to be the most influential. Making progress or achieving results in the bottom descriptors makes it a lot easier to address those that lie higher in the map.


According to the participants of this workshop, the characteristics appear to be the most influential  were: <br>
* Mechanism #1, Big delay in decision making from the governmental side


The participants had time to discuss and reflect on the influence map and in general agreed that the arrows in the map made sense to them. In sum, the participants reported their satisfaction that their voices have been heard and documented and communicated their expectations for follow-up activities to address the diagnosis of their needs.<br> <br>
The workshop was facilitated by [[Elena Aristodemou]] ([[Cyprus Neuroscience and Technology Institute |CNTI]]), [[Aleco Christakis]] and [[Georgina Siitta Achilleos]] ([[Cyprus Neuroscience and Technology Institute |CNTI]]).


==Findings' Summary==
In summary, almost all participants agreed that the following ideas are the most influential and agreed that further actions must take these ideas into account:<br>
<br>
'''Descriptor# 17''': Mutual  agreements  and  programs  in  order  to create mutual basis of understanding.
<br>
'''Descriptor# 22''': The fulfilment of Palestinians’ national ambitions.
<br>
'''Descriptor# 16''': The  important  thing  is  that  the  war  is  stopped and  no  more  people  are  killed  from  the  two sides - Palestinian side and Israeli side.
<br>
'''Descriptor# 2''': Security and sustainable reality for Israelis and the Jewish people.
<br>
'''Descriptors#7 (cycle)''': Each  people  dealing  with  the  problems  and desires independently but with cooperation and
mutual assistance. Descriptor# 22: The fulfilment of Palestinians national ambitions, Descriptor# 16: The important thing is that the war is stopped and no more people are killed from the two sides - Palestinian side and Israeli side, Descriptor# 2: Security and sustainable reality for Israelis and the Jewish people, Descriptor# 7: Each people dealing with the problems and desires independently but with cooperation and mutual assistance.<br>
==Participants==
<br>
The participants of the SDD co-laboratory are:
<br>
{|border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" align="left"
|-
! scope="col" style="background:#efefef;" align="left"| Name
! scope="col" style="background:#efefef;" align="left"| Job title
! scope="col" style="background:#efefef;" align="left"| Country
|-
|Abeer George Youssef Awwad
|Student
|Palestinian
|-
|Aia Harel
|Student
|Israeli
|-
|Anat Romberg
|Hanoar Haoved Vehalomed -Youth organization
|Israeli
|-
|Dar Nadler
|Public administrator
|Israeli
|-
|David Swissa
|NGO/PR
|Israeli
|-
|Erez Naar
|Head of Scholarship and dormitories / Student
|Israeli
|-
|Hana Azmi Al-Atrash
|News Producer
|Palestinian
|-
|Husam Hussein m. almeghari
|President of PDC
|Palestinian
|-
|Itamar Tas
|Student
|Israeli
|-
|Iyad  m. a. faqih
|Business man/merchant
|Palestinian
|-
|Jehonatan Golany
|Business man
|Israeli
|-
|Karin Reingewertz
|Director of NGO community work
|Israeli
|-
|Lior Reshef – Deri
|Chairman of a student union / Student
|Israeli
|-
|Majd Jammal
|Project coordinator
|Palestinian
|-
|Manal Isam Ali Ghaben
|Assistant home mother
|Palestinian
|-
|Qais Osama Abdel rahman Maghary
|Sales Section Manager
|Palestinian
|-
|Roi Shindler
|Lawyer
|Israeli
|-
|Shadi ahmad Abdullah alassi
|EST employee
|Palestinian
|-
|Simon Dabit
|Project manager
|Palestinian
|-
|Yasmin Celine Confino
|Administrative assistant to the CEO, advocate
|Israeli
|-
|Ziyad mohmd mohmd alaydi
|Business man
|Palestinian
|}






==External Links==


* [http://www.cardiac-eu.org/about/index.htm CARDIAC Website]


[[Category:Future Worlds Center Projects]]
[[Category:Future Worlds Center Projects]]

Latest revision as of 03:29, 8 March 2013

Act Beyond Borders: Vision of “what ought to be”
Act Beyond Borders: Vision of “what ought to be”
Report Title SDDP Act Beyond Borders Vision Building (Larnaka 2010)
Project Act Beyond Borders
Triggering Question “What are descriptors of a mutually beneficial co-existence of Israelis and Palestinians?”
Dates 24th - 31th February 2010
Author(s) Anna-Maria Drousiotou
Editor(s) Yiannis Laouris, Larry Fergeson, Kerstin Wittig, Aleco Christakis
Total Duration 6 days
Statistics Participants=21
Number of ideas=69
Number of Clusters=10
Ideas received Votes=6



SDD Co-Laboratory Overview

The workshop was facilitated by Dr.Yiannis Laouris (CNTI), Dr. Aleco Christakis , Dr. Antonis Loizou, Mrs. Maria Kyprianou.

This report was prepared in the context of the project “Human Rights and Reconciliation – Civil Society Acts Beyond Borders’.

The project brought together stakeholders from Israel and the Palestinian Territories with the view of facilitating the peaceful conciliation and management of group interests and promoting solutions on divisive matters or controversial areas.


The Triggering Question (TQ) was:

“What are descriptors of a mutually beneficial co-existence of Israelis and Palestinians?”


In response to the TQ, the 21 participants of the interactive co-laboratory collected a total of 69 descriptors. In the next step, a smaller group of the participants clustered all ideas. The following ten clusters were formed:


Cluster 1: Freedom of Movement
Cluster 2: Sustainable Future for Israel
Cluster 3: Civil Society
Cluster 4: Equality and Self-determination
Cluster 5: Controversial Issues
Cluster 6: Allocation of Priorities
Cluster 7: Economic Cooperation
Cluster 9: Coexistence Tools
Cluster 10: No More War


Having classified all ideas according to the clusters, all participants voted for their most favourable descriptors. The votes were widely spread among most of the descriptors. The descriptors that received the most votes were:


Descriptor# 50 (12 votes): The Palestinian refugees will return.
Descriptor# 9 (10 votes): Moving from one city to other without wasting time at checkpoints.
Descriptor# 7 (8 votes): Each people dealing with the problems and desires independently but with cooperation and mutual assistance.
Descriptor# 68 (7 votes): A major decrease of both nationalism and religiosity ideas and perceptions of life among people of both sides.
Descriptor# 36 (6 votes): Israel and Palestine will be a major player in the world economy.
Descriptor# 60 (6 votes): After one year from now we will not see any Palestinian in Israeli prisons.


The voting results were used to select ideas for the subsequent structuring process which resulted in the creation of what is called ‘a tree of influences', shown below.


Tree of Influence

MAP for Tree_of_influence3s.
Influence tree



The highly complex ‘tree of influence’, also referred to as an ‘influence map’ consists of five different levels of influence. Descriptors at the bottom are considered to be the most influential. Making progress or achieving results in the bottom descriptors makes it a lot easier to address those that lie higher in the map.


Findings' Summary

In summary, almost all participants agreed that the following ideas are the most influential and agreed that further actions must take these ideas into account:


Descriptor# 17: Mutual agreements and programs in order to create mutual basis of understanding.
Descriptor# 22: The fulfilment of Palestinians’ national ambitions.
Descriptor# 16: The important thing is that the war is stopped and no more people are killed from the two sides - Palestinian side and Israeli side.
Descriptor# 2: Security and sustainable reality for Israelis and the Jewish people.
Descriptors#7 (cycle): Each people dealing with the problems and desires independently but with cooperation and mutual assistance. Descriptor# 22: The fulfilment of Palestinians national ambitions, Descriptor# 16: The important thing is that the war is stopped and no more people are killed from the two sides - Palestinian side and Israeli side, Descriptor# 2: Security and sustainable reality for Israelis and the Jewish people, Descriptor# 7: Each people dealing with the problems and desires independently but with cooperation and mutual assistance.


Participants


The participants of the SDD co-laboratory are:

Name Job title Country
Abeer George Youssef Awwad Student Palestinian
Aia Harel Student Israeli
Anat Romberg Hanoar Haoved Vehalomed -Youth organization Israeli
Dar Nadler Public administrator Israeli
David Swissa NGO/PR Israeli
Erez Naar Head of Scholarship and dormitories / Student Israeli
Hana Azmi Al-Atrash News Producer Palestinian
Husam Hussein m. almeghari President of PDC Palestinian
Itamar Tas Student Israeli
Iyad m. a. faqih Business man/merchant Palestinian
Jehonatan Golany Business man Israeli
Karin Reingewertz Director of NGO community work Israeli
Lior Reshef – Deri Chairman of a student union / Student Israeli
Majd Jammal Project coordinator Palestinian
Manal Isam Ali Ghaben Assistant home mother Palestinian
Qais Osama Abdel rahman Maghary Sales Section Manager Palestinian
Roi Shindler Lawyer Israeli
Shadi ahmad Abdullah alassi EST employee Palestinian
Simon Dabit Project manager Palestinian
Yasmin Celine Confino Administrative assistant to the CEO, advocate Israeli
Ziyad mohmd mohmd alaydi Business man Palestinian